What's Best 4 Spencer

15 Top QUESTIONS & ANSWERS



PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN OUR NEW PETITION

My Core Values 


Recent Proof of Abuse (Spencer at Age 6)

Parental Discretion is Advised

July 22, 2014 Videos in Sequence Order















50 Second YouTube Web Link















1 Minute 40 Second YouTube Web Link















1 Minute 30 Second YouTube Web Link














1 Minute 26 Second YouTube Web Link














1 Minute YouTube Web Link














1 Minute 2 Second YouTube Web Link


Spencer innocently telling me about

the ABUSE at Age 3 or 4














  2 Minute 15 Second YouTube Web Link


Recent Proof of Improper Care and Child Neglect (Spencer at Age 6)

May 27, 2014



 










40 Second YouTube Web Link


Georgia Supreme Court

Oral Arguments
September 13, 2010














2 Minute Oral Argument Conclusion
2 Minute YouTube Web Link 















10 MINUTE Oral Argument in its entirety - Part 2 of 2 - Tube Web Link

https://youtu.be/ejLb6P7WQK4















10 MINUTE LEGAL DEFENSE Oral Argument in its entirety - Part 1 of 2 - YouTube Web Link
https://youtu.be/qBptFwEtiWA


________________________________________

U.S. Department of Justice Response





















Response from President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder


______________________________________

U.S. House of Representatives Response
Congressman John Lewis




















Response from Congressman John Lewis about the Corruption
________________________________________

State of Georgia Responses
________________________



GA Judicial Qualifications Commission

     



















________________________

State Bar of Georgia     





















________________________

Judicial Council of Georgia
Board of Court Reporting






















The State of Georgia via Judge Doris L. Downs (The 4th NEW Judge Assigned to the case), Filed and Date Stamped Rule Nisi on a Motion for Contempt (to have me fraudulently arrested and incarcerated again)for yet another FELONY charge for Filing for Custody of Spencer in the State of North Carolina. *Disclaimer - The validity of the attached Rule Nisi has not been verified.  I have not been properly served via Sheriffs entry of service (as required by GA Law) and therefore I did not attend the hearing.  It was received via email from Attorney Willis and therefore should not be relied on as a factual notice of hearing.





















______________________________________
State of North Carolina Responses
 
________________________


NC Judicial Standards Commission



















________________________

NC Social Services Department



















________________________

NC Court of Appeals Calendar Notice





















________________________


Court Orders and Complaint Responses

________________________


Latest Federal and Judicial Qualifications Commission Complaint


Court Reporter Nanette Hull Subpoena

Judge Tom Campbell Motion to Quash (Get Rid Of) Subpoena

Judicial Qualifications Commissions Findings / Motion for Modification of Visitation

Judge John Goger March 14, 2013 Final Order on Petition for Change of Custody (Second Trial), which Still Legally Grants Joint Custody and shifts Physical Custody to my ex-husband but without all of the Fraudulent New Restrictions on Visitation

Judge John Goger Order FORCING PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION from their Attorney friend and Colleague who also happens to be a Psychologist, Attorney Sarah Brogdon

Judge John Goger Notice of Motion for Contempt for refusing to be Psychologically Evaluated by Attorney Sarah Brogdon.

Judge John Goger Order on June 7 2013 Hearing on Additional Made Up Restrictions

Judge John Goger Arrest Order and Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage

Judge Gail Tusan Motion to Request Presiding Judge to Rule on my Closed Case Orders

Judge John Goger Order to Quash (Get Rid Of) Police Officer / Teacher Subpoenas and Order to Prevent me from Filing ANY Petitions, Motions and Subpoenas in the Superior Court Clerks office for the Third and Fourth Trials

Police Officer, Teacher and Guardian Ad Litem Subpoenas

Witness Trial Testimony Questionnaire - Teachers Assistant 

Ben Hill Christian Academy Notice of Criminal Trespass and Cease & Desist

Judge John Goger Motion to Request to File Petitions, Motions and Subpoenas in the Superior Court Clerks Office for the Fourth Trial

Georgia Supreme Court Case - Provides Specification on Maximum Time frame for Unsupervised Visitation

Georgia Supreme Court Case - Provides Legal Reasoning for Drug Testing

Chief Judge Cynthia Wright Final Order and Decree of Divorce on First Trial

Judge John Goger Final Order on Child Support and Attorneys Fees for the Second Trial

Judge John Goger Order Dismissing Motion for Contempt against my Ex-Husband and Petition for Change of Custody

Judge John Goger Order to Dismiss Request to File the Fourth Trial in the Superior Court Clerks Office

Judge John Goger Court Date for Fraudulent Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage

Judge John Goger Latest Court Date on Fraudulent Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage and Motion for Contempt against me that still has not been provided or Served by the Sheriffs as required by Law

Atlanta Mayor (Attorney) Kasim Reed's Latest Timeline on Manipulation


Judge John Goger Latest Order onFraudulent Motion to Address Child Support Arrearage that was NEVER PAID by my ex-husband

The State of North Carolina Court of Appeals Docket Confirmation, Filed and Date Stamped Brief and Supplemental Brief Cover Sheets

The State of Georgia via Judge Doris L. Downs (The 4th NEW Judge Assigned to the case), Filed and Date Stamped Rule Nisi on a Motion for Contempt (to have me fraudulently arrested and incarcerated again) for yet another FELONY charge for Filing for Custody of Spencer in the State of North Carolina. *Disclaimer - The validity of the attached Rule Nisi has not been verified.  I have not been properly served via Sheriffs entry of service (as required by GA Law) and therefore I did not attend the hearing.  It was received via email from Attorney Willis and therefore should not be relied on as a factual notice of hearing.

The State of North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission Findings on Judicial Misconduct

The State of North Carolina Social Services 7-25-14 Findings - We (as in the State of North Carolina) have jurisdiction (As Spencer's Mother, I legally have Joint Custody and I reside in the State of North Carolina... which means that the State of North Carolina has the emergency legal grounds and jurisdiction under N.C. G.S § 7B-302 to act in Spencer's Best Interest)... BUT we don't want to get ANYONE in trouble for not doing their jobs so we are going to IGNORE the circumstances and the situation and refer the case back to the State of Georgia... which we know has proven over the last six years that they will not act in Spencer's Best Interest in order to protect the Judges, Justices and Officers of the Court who not only failed to act in Spencer's Best Interest but they committed Felony Crimes and / or Legal Errors in doing so.  

The State of North Carolina - September 24, 2014 Calendar Notice

Judge Doris L. Downs found me in Contempt of Court on December 16, 2014 in Fulton County, GA Superior Court AND took away my custodial rights to Spencer (without out Proper Service... or ANY Service as I did not know about the hearing) because….

1.    I am a "Dead Beat" Mother who chooses not to see Spencer (A Lie.  Judge John Goger's fraudulent Order stipulates that I cannot see Spencer and I was arrested and incarcerated for 10 days for requesting my right to visit with Spencer as order by the same judge (Judge John Goger) that granted me the right to visitation).  * Also note that my ex-husband would hide out with Spencer instead of handing him over when it was my turn for shared joint custody.  Each time that he would hide out,  I would contact the police to have them assist me with “finding” Spencer (at Attorney Willis’ home when he chose to answer the door).  When Attorney Willis “could not be found”, I would go down to the courthouse to request that the Presiding Judge (as authorized by law)read (interpret) my Court Order (Hearing) on visitation (issued by  Judge John Goger) to have them rule that my ex-husband should hand over Spencer for visitation.  However, none of the Judges would rule against Judge John Goger.  In fact Judge Kimberly Adams (on the occasion that she was the Presiding Judge sworn to uphold the law) decided that she did not want to rule on the case (against Judge John Goger and his own order) and she intentionally (although she knows personally knows Spencer and I.  I previously worked on her election campaign) sent me to Judge John Gogers courtroom wherein he promptly took me into custody are required that I serve 10 days in the Fulton Court Jail for the felony charge of requesting my right to visitation with Spencer.   

2.    I refuse to pay child support.  Another Lie.  In fact the previous Judge (John Goger the one that issued an Order for my fraudulent arrest and incarceration) found on two separate occasions (via Orders on Motions for Contempt designed to have me fraudulently incarcerated) that my Child Support is the maintenance of all of Spencer's Health related expenses… which I maintained since prior to Spencer’s birth). 

3.    Finally Judge Doris L. Downs found that I owe my ex-husband Spencer’s child support (paid in the form of Health related expenses) AND my ex-husbands Attorney's Fees… which reduced the sum total of back child support (more than $25K) that my ex-husband currently owes me and refuses to pay.

By the way, the above is actually a victory given that this latest Motion for Contempt was filed with the intent of having me fraudulently arrested and incarcerated again for filing for Change of Custody of Spencer in the State of North Carolina. Now both cases are on Appeal in Federal Court.

WhatsBest4Spencer Petition Views as of December 15, 2014 @ 8:18 AM
 
Judge Terrence Boyle February 23, 2015 Order of Dismissal in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina due to lack of Jurisdiction.  
 
* However Judge Terrence Boyle is only partially correct in his use of "Discernment" in his February 23, 2015 ruling.  The U.S. District Courts (Like the State of North Carolina Courts) does not have jurisdiction over Constitutional Violations.  The U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all cases involving Constitutional Violations.  However what Judge Terrence Boyle fails to mention is that he (via his use of discernment) has the ability to use Long Arm Statutes to act in Spencer’s Best Interest.  Judge Terrence (Like all the other Judges) just doesn’t want to use his discernment to act in Spencer’s Best Interest because doing so would require that he expose the legal errors (best described as felony crimes) that his judicial colleagues chose of their own free will to commit.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (North Carolina) Informal Briefing Order Notice

United States District Court Northern District of Georgia - Atlanta Division - Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. April 8, 2015 Denial Order on Appellate Review

United States District Court Northern District of Georgia - Atlanta Division - Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. May 11, 2015 UPDATED Denial Order on Appellate Review

The Georgia Civil Liberties Act, previously ghost written by me to address the need for Judicial Reform in the State of Georgia.  The State of Georgia's Response is Georgia House Resolution No. 1113 Act No 537 Ga L. 2016, p. 896 , which DOES NOT ADDRESS ACCOUNTABILITY or any of the concerns as listed in the Georgia Civil Liberties Act. 

 

Federal Complaint Example

To see tangible examples of how I wrote the legal Errors that made it's way all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court and onto Attorney General Eric Holders desk, Download the Latest Federal and Judicial Qualifications Commission Complaint.

Key Pointers to Help Counter Corruption
To read a quick overview of SOME of the legal corruption tricks that I encountered over the last five years and learn SOME of the ways that I avoided or side-stepped the corruption,Download My Story - By Kimberly T. Spence. 

Lawless America - Congressional Proposal
This is not just a State of Georgia corruption problem. Unfortunately, I am but one example case representing millions of American's throughout the United States who DO NOT have access to the Constitutional Rights guaranteed to them as citizens of the United States of America. For more examples, please see the 14,000 + Lawless America Congressional Testimonies on YouTube, view the  
Lawless America - Congressional Legislation Proposal by William Windsor or find out more information by going to www.lawlessamerica.com

Contact Information

Please complete the below requested information to receive PRIVATE Updates and Answers to your most pressing Questions.



state roll call

Question #1 - What’s the status of the cases?

The Supreme Court of the United States ONLY Dockets cases that have proven Constitutional Violations (Michael Duggan, Clerk has already acknowledged that the cases are not meritless) and the Court is MANDATED to Rule on cases involving Constitutional Violations when two or more States file cases. 

On April 4th, the Court denied the type of questions presented and / or The Original Three U.S. Supreme Court Questions presented (they can also be found here… http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc) in their private conference on the first of April.  The April 4th Denial notice provided no legal reasoning or explanation for their decision to refuse to rule on the mandated questions.  However, the Court cited a specific Rule regarding re-hearings or reconsideration of the mandates questions and it specifically involved their ability to “intervene” on the circumstance and / or preserve each State’s Right to Govern as it Pleases and / or States’ Rights.  Based on their specifications, I adjusted the questions so that they would have a better ability to intervene.

For example, instead of references to State’s Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the questions now specify intervening tactics  AND change the wording of the premise of the legal reasoning from States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases to “ensuring ACCESS to inalienable Constitutional Rights”. 

Once the Court received the 16 NEW Questions via email, 5,000+ Insiders and Team advocates on April 5, 2016, the Court (presumably) recognized that they could in fact intervene in the cases and in fact were mandated to do so.  In as much, they have spent nearly a month and a half trying every trick in the book in an effort to prevent the cases from being placed on the Docket, returned to private Conference before the U.S. Supreme Court Justices and ultimately ruled on.  The cases recently appeared on the Docket with a notation that it was filed on April 12, 2016 (a month ago) but this date is an error.  I sent Jeff Atkins, U.S. Supreme Court Clerk Supervisor a copy of the tracking receipt to prove that the questions for re-hearing were presented and / or postmarked April 5, 2016.  However, no further action has been taken with the case and U.S. Supreme Court Clerk, Michael Duggan (in conversation) stated that the Court is now selecting cases based on DEMAND… rather than Constitutional mandate…. Hence the spike in national awareness that you are seeing and will continue to see until William Windsor, Spencer and I… as well as millions of other voiceless American’s are finally provided access to our inalienable Constitutional Rights. 

 
Question #2 - What if the Case Questions Are Denied for the second time?

Again, The Supreme Court of the United States ONLY Dockets cases that have proven Constitutional Violations (Michael Duggan, Clerk has already acknowledged that the cases are not meritless) and the Court is MANDATED to Rule on cases involving Constitutional Violations when two or more States file cases. 

My initial three cases were filed in 2012.  William Windsor’s initial cases were filed in 2011 (I believe).  Once the Court ignored both of our pleas for help, we were personally, professionally and financially attacked relentlessly and mercilessly.  Most of you have read my story.  If not, please click here to familiarize yourself with it… http://bit.ly/1R1Nc2T  Briefly, I have Joint Custody of my eight-year-old son, Spencer but have not been allowed to see him in three years and have not been allowed to speak with him in over a year.  I was fraudulently imprisoned without Due Process in 2013 for the Felony charge of requesting my right to visit with Spencer, as Ordered by our court visitation schedule.  Due to ongoing threats by Officers of the Court to be silent about the corruption, I have not felt comfortable living in my home that I still pay a mortgage for (required to maintain Legal Jurisdiction of the Cases) in over two years.  William Windsor, who is the bravest activist SINCE Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King… because he is bold and brave enough to deal directly with the public (I am primarily in contact with Insiders and Team Members), is currently in hiding somewhere in the Midwest and travels with a bullet proof vest because he has been shot at.  He was fraudulently incarcerated for six months for the Felony charge of Tweeting and sending Case information to the opposing party in his case.  You can read about William Windsor's Story at LawlessAmerica.com.

In as much, if the cases questions are Denied for the second time, we are prepared to simply use other existing cases with Constitutional Violations to argue the cases back up to the U.S. Supreme Court AGAIN.  As I have all but mastered every legal trick in the book… after seven long years of arguing cases in two separate State Supreme Court’s, two separate U.S. District Court’s, two separate Court of Appeals and twice before the U.S. Supreme Court and I would estimate that the existing NEW 16 Questions… along with additional questions involving Constitutional Violations, would be on U.S. Supreme Court Clerk Supervisor, Jeff Atkins desk within less than a year’s time.

Meanwhile, that will provide Insiders, Teams and Organizations MORE time to create the type of awareness and DEMAND for We the People’s ability to access our existing (on paper) inalienable Constitutional Rights… not only nationally, but worldwide that the Court is now requiring.



Question #3 - Who is William Windsor?

You can read about William Windsor, our modern day Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. here https://todayshonoree.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/founder-of-lawless-america-bill-windsor-is-todays-honoree/ , find out what he's been up to at LawlessAmerica.com or see stories of everyday citizens across this nation that he has interviewed on YouTube.



Question #4 - Can I see the Petition for Re-hearing?  What are the specific Grounds for the cases?

As a tax payer, you are paying for a Federal Electronic Filing System called PACER.  You can Register for PACER here… http://1.usa.gov/1TTAFD6 or Log Onto an Existing PACER Account here… http://1.usa.gov/1TcSR8t .  Once you are logged in, locate Case No. 15-6566 (North Carolina) or 15-6567 (Georgia) or any other Case Nos as provided under “State / Federal Case Numbers” on the “About Us Page” here… http://bit.ly/1R1Nc2T to download ANY of the filed and date stamped Petitions, Motions, etc. that have been placed on the Docket.  You may also locate and download (if available) filed and date stamped key documents with each State Supreme Court.

Here is an excerpt of the Petition for Re-hearing, which provides the legal grounds for the cases…

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE JOINT PETITION FOR REHEARING

The Federal Court Rulings in each of the United States District Courts and United States Court of Appeals all conflict with one another on the question of providing citizens with actual, applicable and practical access to inalienable Constitutional Rights.  All citizens undoubtedly have Constitutional Rights in written form. However gaining tangible access to inalienable Constitutional Rights IS THE controlling question of the law which provides intervening circumstances intended to provide a lasting impact on the lives of millions of Americans, especially African American Descendants of Slaves; as supported by the First, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), 28 U.S.C. § 1292, 28 U.S.C. § 1655, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957),  Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006), International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945), Kansas v. Crane, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002), Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938), Menard v. Mitchell, 430 F. 2d 486, Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, O’Connory v. Donaldson, 42 U.S. 563 (1975), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997), Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973), Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) and B. Platsky v. CIA, 953 F. 2d 25, 26 28 (2nd Cir. 1991), United States v. Andrades, 169 F.3d 131, 132 (1999), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976) and United States v. Doe and 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).

William Windsor, Spencer and I (who represent millions of voiceless citizens) have known and have felt the depth and level of sorrow and pain of systemic oppression, threats and retaliation resulting from our efforts to seek and gain access to freedom, liberty, justice, equality and basic human rights for nearly a decade at all jurisdictional levels, via the U.S. Department of Justice, Congress, President and all State Entities.  While the Court has in years past chosen to be silent on the matter, the decision of this Court is ripe for judgment given that the petitioners have never received relief and millions of citizens are still suffering under systemic oppression.

We stand on THE hollowed, historic and sacred grounds of Soujouner Truth, who once asked... "Ain't I a Woman"; Harriet Tubman who once stated...  "Twasn't me, 'twas the Lord!...”; Joan Trumpauer Mulholland who once mentioned.. “It’s not just one person that does it all….   but it’s lot’s of people that you’ve never heard of doing what’s right….” that will shift the trajectory of this nation into the more perfect union that we all desire right NOW, for our children and for our children’s children. Pioneers like Lucy Burns, Shirley Chisholm, Septima Poinsette Clark, Claudette Colvin, Fannie Lou Hammer, Dr. Pauli Murray, Alice Paul, Rosa Parks, Ida B. Wells Barnett, Francis Willard and so many others paved the way, but we must press on to a higher calling that is greater than any one individual or profession.  For United we Stand.   



Question #5 - Aren’t there other options?  Why take the Cases to the U.S. Supreme Court?

Yes, there are other options and William Windsor and I have tried ALL of them over the last 8-10 years.  Seriously!!!  Between the two of us, we have tried every State and Federal tax payer funded entity several times.  Seriously.  There are three primary methods to change policy and legislation nationwide.  I talk about them in detail under the Example Cases / Complaintsection here… http://bit.ly/1V15LLD

Briefly (again), we have tried ALL methods and have determined (given that neither William Windsor, Spencer or I have ever received relief and / or Justice) that the VERY BEST way to ensure that citizens finally have access to their inalienable Constitutional Rights (method established over 50 Years ago by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall) is to present legal cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, which are based on REAL LIFE EXPERIENCES… rather than made up theories about what could… or would… or should happen when citizens attempt to access their inalienable Constitutional Rights.

P.S. Here is the U.S. Supreme Court Tracking information, which established April5, 2016 as the correct post marked date for the 16 New Questions.





































Question #6 - What can I do to help?
 
A.     Please tweet, share, post, like, email and text your friends and loved ones with the current U.S. Supreme Court Case Information.



Please copy and Paste the below TWEETS and share them with your followers.


See16 New US SupCrt Ques wCASE  Update on CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS http://bit.ly/24Xf9m9 & READ FAQ http://bit.ly/1smOjFQ

See16 New US SupCrt Ques wCASE  Update on FAMILY RIGHTS here http://bit.ly/24Xf9m9 & READ FAQ http://bit.ly/1smOjFQ

See16 New US SupCrt Ques wCASE  Update on ACCOUNTABILITY here http://bit.ly/24Xf9m9 & READ FAQ http://bit.ly/1smOjFQ

See16 New US SupCrt Ques wCASE  Update on JUDICIAL REFORM here http://bit.ly/24Xf9m9 & READ FAQ http://bit.ly/1smOjFQ

See16 New US SupCrt Ques wCASE  Update on MASS INCARCERATION http://bit.ly/24Xf9m9 & READ FAQ http://bit.ly/1smOjFQ


____________________


Read US Supreme Crt Case Ques on Constitutional Rights here http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc and more info here www.whatsbest4spencer.com

Read US Supreme Crt Case Ques on Family Rights here http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc and more info here www.whatsbest4spencer.com

Read US Supreme Crt Case Ques on Accountability here http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc and more info here www.whatsbest4spencer.com

Read US Supreme Crt Case Ques on Mass Incarceration here http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc and more info here www.whatsbest4spencer.com

Read US Supreme Crt Case Ques on Judicial Reform here http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc and more info here www.whatsbest4spencer.com

________________________________

Please copy and Paste the below post and share it with your friends on FACEBOOK.
 

Hi!

The U.S. Supreme Court currently has 16 NEW questions related to ensuring access to inalienable Constitutional Rights, life, liberty, freedom, justice and equality for all citizens of the United States of America.  The cases will also address the Best Interest of a Child, Judicial Reform, Public Servant Accountability and Mass Incarceration.

Now is the time to address issues that matter most to our families and the future of this nation. Please download and read all 16 NEW Questions, sign the Petition and share the case information with all of your contacts.
 

Please Download the 16 New U.S. Supreme Court Questions here..
http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc



Please sign our Petition here...
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9

or Please Sign our BRAND NEW Petition here...
https://campaigns.organizefor.org/petitions/scotus-grant-cases-on-mass-incarceration-public-servant-accountability-and-best-interest-of-a-child

 
Please find more information at our re-branded website here...
www.WhatsBest4Spencer.com (newly rebranded)

Thank you SINCERELY!!!

________________________________

Please copy and Paste the below message into a new EMAIL.  Be sure to Blind Carbon Copy your Friend so that no-one can see the email address of the recipients.  *The Blind Carbon Copy Option is indicated as “BCC” .


Hi!

The U.S. Supreme Court currently has 16 NEW questions related to ensuring access to inalienable Constitutional Rights, life, liberty, freedom, justice and equality for all citizens of the United States of America.  The cases will also address the Best Interest of a Child, Judicial Reform, Public Servant Accountability and Mass Incarceration.

Now is the time to address issues that matter most to our families and the future of this nation. Please download and read all 16 NEW Questions, sign the Petition and share the case information with all of your contacts.



Please Download the 16 New U.S. Supreme Court Questions here..
http://bit.ly/1Tb6sxc



Please sign our Petition here...
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9


or Please Sign our BRAND NEW Petition here...
https://campaigns.organizefor.org/petitions/scotus-grant-cases-on-mass-incarceration-public-servant-accountability-and-best-interest-of-a-child

 
Please find more information at our re-branded website here...
www.WhatsBest4Spencer.com (newly rebranded)

Thank you SINCERELY!!!
 

B.     Please help fund the mounted cost of the U.S. Supreme Court Cases and What's Best 4 Spencer cause expenses by clicking here... gofund.me/vzen8e8s

 
C.     Please Read all of the U.S. Supreme Court Case Information on www.WhatsBest4Spencer.com (newly rebranded) so that you can understand and explain why a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court Justices is so important right now and how these cases will positively impact your future, the future  of your children and the lasting future of this nation.            



Question #7 - We know about the connection between Mayor Kasim Reed and your ex-husband, Congressman John Lewis, Judge Tom Campbell, etc..  What is your connection to Mayor Kasim Reed?  

I began volunteering for Atlanta Mayor (Attorney) Kasim Reeds (Download the Timeline of Manipulation and PHOTOS of the KEY PLAYERS in this Federal Corruption Scandal) first election campaign in order to attempt to get my foot back into the political door… after quietly leaving my position at the conclusion of my maternity leave(for Spencer, my first born and only child) with a political party. 


It should also be noted that I chose to quietly leave this particular political party because the then Executive Director Matt Weyandt (who I believe has been promoted within the ranks and now works for Congressman John Lewis) refused to increase my entry level salary (which I accepted despite my experience because I truly wanted to change careers) so that I could not afford childcare as well as refused to allow me to work from home (as I have for years now... despite my proven work ethic, proven skills and proven capability of always delivering more than expected or required) while maintaining the entry level position salary. 

As a volunteer for Mayor Kasim Reeds first campaign, I mistakenly made the choice to place a yard sign in my front yard and that's how my ex-husband (his Attorney Colleague and Fraternity Brother) found out where I was working for free and / or volunteering. Mayor Kasim Reed then made the choice to fraudulently intervene with my trial proceedings... as a favor to my ex-husband who was considering the prospect of venturing into legal politics.  The benefit to Mayor Kasim Reed is that he would have an Attorney who would be readily available and willing to legally "fix" cases and / or case proceedings that benefit his political agenda.   

I in NO WAY would every again endorse Mayor Kasim Reed (#MomsforReed) or ANY of the Political or Legal professionals listed above, in the Federal Cases / Complaints or in my story… not just because they committed felonies in order to manipulate the outcome of my trials… or because the result of their needless meddling caused so much pain for Spencer, my family and I (likely a decision made by the Mayor because he is a 40+ year old man who has never been married, does not have children and therefore can not relate to or understand the needs of families)but because they were so callously self-serving with regards to taking responsibility for their choices and their actions in an effort to re-writing their egregious, malicious and intentionally wrong Errors (crimes)... so that Spencer, my family and I could successfully move on with our lives.   

It should be noted that we (Spencer, my family and I) were otherwise leading a normal life after my separation and then divorce from my ex-husband... until Mayor Kasim Reed intentionally chose to step in and violate my Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial (repeatedly for YEARS to protect himself and his profession colleagues once the Errors (crimes he / they committed were exposed... despite having knowledge of my personal character... and despite being repeatedly urged to resolve these matters privately)... and HIS CHOICE (time and again) to refuse to take responsibility for his choices (as with Congressman John Lewis, Chief Judge Cynthia Wright, Judge Tom Campbell, Judge John Goger, etc.) and the results of his actions is reprehensible.

Moreover, if Mayor Kasim Reed, Congressman John Lewis, Chief Judge Cynthia Wright, Judge Tom Campbell, Judge John Goger, are the "gold stamp" examples of what one should expect from our Political and Judicial "Leaders" (based on their use of “Discernment” and “Best Interest” of a child in my cases... as well as indicative of how they "fixed" my cases and complaints privately as "Leaders") then ALL Woman, Mothers and Families should definitely and clearly be afraid... very afraid not only for Spencer, but for the future of ALL children -trapped nationwide in the flawed system of States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases. 

I think… actually, I know that we can do better for our families if we not only demand but expect better from our "Leaders"… especially “leaders” that serve in capacities that impact our most vital systems of government. That’s why I will not endorse, volunteer for, financially assist or help (in any way) any of the political and / or legal professionals linked to any of the Federal Cases and / or Complaints... OR endorse anyone who supports the continuation of States' Rights to Govern as it Pleases as a legal means to resolve cases and complaints.
 
ALL citizens are entitled to the Constitutional Rights afforded them as citizens of the United States of America and unfortunately States' Rights to Govern as it Pleases prevents citizens from having access to their Constitutional Rights.


Question #8 - Please explain the "REAL REASON" why you were arrested and incarcerated for ten (10) days.

The legal means for false arrest and incarceration was Contempt  for requesting my right to four weeks of summer visitation as outlined in my Final Order written by the same judge that falsely arrested and incarcerated me (Judge John Goger).  Here’s the story.

Beginning during the Christmas season of 2012, I began to document the number of times that my ex-husband refused (Contempt) to allow visitation as Ordered.  When my ex-husband refused to allow me to have Christmas visitation (after several long hours of waiting), I simply went to my ex-husbands home, called the police and waited outside for them to arrive. When they arrived, I showed them the Order and they agreed that I should have custody but could not give me custody because my ex-husband refused to answer the door (Spencer informed me of this at a later date).  The next day, I went down to the Courthouse to see the Presiding Judge (Judge Markle) who upon being presented the evidence (my Order granting me the right to visitation) decided that he would not rule on the case (as the assigned Presiding Judge should) and that he would instead contact Judge John Goger (the Judge that issued the Order on visitation) and long story short, my family and I missed Christmas with Spencer because the Presiding Judge (who legally should have ruled on or interpreted the existing visitation order) refused to do so and I did not have a hearing with the assigned Judge (Judge John Goger) that would allow him to rule on or interpret his own Order.

The same scenario of requesting and then being denied visitation by my ex-husband occurred on just about every weekend or holiday.  For example, I was only able to take the main photo of Spencer and I on Mother’s Day because I went to my ex-husbands home, called the police, waited for them to arrive and on this occasion, my ex-husband answered the door so he had no other choice but to relinquish custody.

On yet another occasion, my ex-husband (An Attorney) argued that his Attorney (Attorney Sanders) advised him not to give me visitation because I was mentally insane and would take Spencer out of State and not return him for a month.  It should also be noted that he provided these same FALSE and misleading statements to all of the parents of Spencer’s classmates during a private (as I was not invited) after school / after hours meeting called by Menyuan Smith (The Director at Ben Hill Academy, which is led by Pastor Richard Winn. It should also be noted that Menyuan Smith is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., the same sorority that I am a member of.  This mention is noted because I want everyone to know and understand that I make personal and professional decisions based on Integrity and not personal relationships, favors or affiliations.) to explain to all of them the rational for calling the police (Police Office Voight) to attempt to have me arrested for visiting Spencer based on Judge John Goger (which did not specify that I could no longer visit/ volunteer at Spencers school.  The school instead issued a Criminal Trespass Notice based on my ex-husbands desire not to allow me to visit Spencer at school).

Still on yet many-many other occasions that I requested but was then denied visitation, I (like the Christmas scenario) went to my ex-husbands home, called the police, waited for them to arrive, handed them the legal Order and if my husband would not answer the door (numerous occasions), I took the day off from work, paid for parking and went see the Presiding Judge to request my right to visitation as Ordered in my Final Order. On each occasion, the Presiding Judge (instead of ruling on the evidence… The order) would contact Judge John Goger or tell me that I would have to request permission from Judge John Goger for them to rule on his existing Order.  Judge Goger would then deny the Presiding Judge the “right” (as if he actually has the legal right to tell his legal colleagues not to actually do their jobs) to rule on my case and I would simply have to suck up the fact that I didn’t have visitation(again)… week in and week out. It should be noted that there is a NEW Presiding Judge every week and so essentially, I rotated through to see nearly ALL of the Judges and each one chose not to rule on the visitation order as required as a favor to Judge John Goger. 

In as much, I had gathered quite a bit of proof (approximately 9 Police Officers who either showed up to my ex-husbands house to help me to obtain visitation when my husband refused or showed up to the school (Officer Voight) or overhead the Staff Attorney’s for the Presiding Judges refuse to rule on the case and direct me to see the assigned Judge (Judge John Goger) over almost the span of one year) that my ex-husband and his legal colleagues were intentionally violating my Constitutional Right to a fair trial and hearing… but more importantly, intentionally refusing to allow me to see Spencer as Ordered.  All of this evidence was gathered and submitted in Complaint form to the Judicial Qualifications Commission for each incident (as the State of Georgia has a Five (5) day Rule to file Complaints… otherwise its as if the Error or Crime NEVER happened and you will have no other choice but to abide by whatever made-up laws that they want.  Each State has its own Rule for filing Complaints so you must research the filing dates on your own).

On the day that I was falsely (I say falsely because I was Denied Due Process… my ex-husband did not file a Motion for Contempt, I was never served via Sheriffs Service and I was not provided with 30 days to respond to the Motion for Contempt prior to my false arrest and incarceration) arrested and incarcerated, I went to see Presiding Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams to request my right to four (4) weeks of summer visitation as Ordered and just like ALL of the other Judges before her, she stated that I would have to have permission from Judge John Goger (the assigned Judge) in Order for her to rule on my case (a lie). 

Presumably angry about the multiple Complaints that were filed with the Judicial Qualifications Commission… wanting me to stop requesting his colleagues (the Presiding Judges) to actually do their jobs and interpret the visitation Order… having the desire to prevent me from documenting via the Police Officer testimony (I subpoenaed all of them to testify as witnessed in the third Trial but Judge John Goger Quashed (got rid of) the subpoenas and then promptly dismissed the case so that they could not testify)… placing a new Order (without a Motion, Sheriffs Service, 30 days to respond… Due Process) which essentially took away ALL of my rights to visitation unless I agreed to be psychologically evaluated by their psychologist (who also happens to be an Attorney) friend, Judge John Goger decided that June 14, 2013 would be the day that I would need to go to jail to learn the lesson that the Constitution does not apply in the State of Georgia. 

It should be noted that he was extremely calculated about his choice to violate my Constitution Right to a Fair Trial.  Note only did he sentence me to TEN (10) days in jail (with out Due Process or a Fair Trail), but he specifically listed the date and time that I could be released on the arrest Order (June 24, 2013 at 10:00 AM) to be certain that I would serve day for day and hour for hour. Why… because he knew that they jail was over crowded, with no previous record of arrest and incarceration and with a FELONY charge of Contempt for requesting my right to visitation, I would be released from jail just as soon as they booked me in (Although I had no bond).  However, he was not JUST BEING SPITEFUL, he had a purpose!!! He knew that I was aware of the FIVE (5) day rule to file Judicial Complaints and most certainly knew that I would be filing yet another one based not only on the fraudulent arrest and incarceration… but the changes to the visitation Order / custody that he made (two days prior) without a Motion / Petition being filed by my ex-husband, Sheriffs Service, 30 days to respond or even a trial AND he wanted the new Orders (clear Errors or Crimes) to be permanently legally and they would be if I were not able to file a Complaint. I was sentenced to 10 days, well past the five days required to file a Judicial Qualifications Commission Complaint and you cannot have visitation (while incarcerated for the first week).  It should be noted that this plan backfired as I was able to (with the help of several people) file the Complaint anyway.  However, President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder don’t want the “responsibility” of enforcing the Constitution and therefore I as well as millions of citizens trapped in this cyclical “system” continue to be denied our most basic rights on a daily basis.

 
Question #9 - Do you have a history of mental illness or have you ever been declared mentally insane?

NO!!! 

However, this has not stopped them from using this argument as a “legal” means to take away my right to not only custody but visitation because each judge has the right to use his “Discernment” to determine what’s in the “Best Interest” of a child.

The same Judge (Judge John Goger) who made up Orders in my case also created Orders in two other high profile cases.

In the case of Usher and Tameka Raymond, Tameka Raymond mistakenly (in my opinion) agreed to be psychologically evaluated and she was diagnosed with the mental illness of “Narcissism” and the initial Judge (as the cases were swapped just like my cases were swapped so that all of the Errors or Crimes won’t fall to one Judge) used her diagnosis (in my opinion) as a factor to “Discern” that it would be in the “Best Interest” of the children for them to live with Usher Raymond (who travels a lot).  Judge Goger then used is “Discernment” (after a near drowning incident involving care takers) to determine that it would be in the young children’s “Best Interest” that the children remain in Usher Raymond’s custody and care instead of their mothers care and custody. 

Click here to Read an article about the Usher and Tameka Raymond Custody Battle 

In another local case ruled on by the same Judge, Judge John Goger used his “Discernment” to determine that it would be in the child’s “Best Interest” to grant custody to the child’s father (an accused Child Molester) after an extortionate (I believe $130,000) payment to the Guardian Ad Litem who I am certain “researched” and likely “FORGOT” to show up with relevant evidence as is in my case.

Click here to Watch news coverage of Protest against Judge John Gogers use of "Discernment"


* If you agree to give up your Constitutional Right to refuse to be psychologically evaluated, you will most certainly be controlled (for the rest of your life) by a Judges flawed and criminal use of “Discernment” and “Best Interest”… that’s why to date, I have refused.

* If you gave up your Constitutional Right to refuse to be Psychologically Evaluated but want your children back or even simply a way out of the oppressive and controlling system, a source explained that you can seek another Psychological Evaluation with a high profile Psychologist who has much more credentials… and prayerfully no relationships with the Judges and / or Court System (If their income is tied into their decision, they will ALWAYS base their decision on their ability to earn a living) to provide and evaluation that can trump the initial evaluation but you will still face a lengthy legal process to regain your right to parent or be apart of your child’s life and you will always have to legally explain the initial evaluation.
 

Question #10 - Why can’t or didn't you just ask President Obama former Attorney General Eric Holder or current Attorney General Loretta Lynch to investigate all of your allegations and allow justice to be served?  Why try to settle your case through the U.S. Supreme Court?

As far as investigations are concerned, all of the State and Federal Agencies (Including the FBI and the Department of Justice) have investigated ALL of my allegations outlined in the numerous Department of Justice, Judicial Qualifications Commission, State Bar of Georgia, Board of Court Reporting, etc. Complaints that span over the course of FIVE years.

The latest response from President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder (via the Department of Justice) is that they don’t want the “RESPONSIBILITY of ENFORCING” THE CONSTITUTION.

Click here to Read President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder's response


"We have given careful consideration... The matter you related IS NOT covered by a Federal Civil Rights statute (Although each Federal Civil Rights Statute is clearly listed with each Enumeration of Error)which we have (which should really read... Which we want) the "responsibility of enforcing."

Ok, so since this White House Administration does not want the responsibility of enforcing the Constitution (Huh??? Yes, that’s what they are saying!!!), then the alternative is to have the U.S. Supreme Court rule on my four States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases cases… Right???

Wrong, this White House Administration (made up of mostly Attorneys in every key position) is not so keen on changing (via the Justice System) the “System” that they are use to and believe they are entitled to… mainly because such a change would essentially require that ALL States abide by the Constitution… instead of States Rights to Govern as it Pleases AND a whole heck of a lot of Judicial and Political Insiders… who rely of special perks and favors to govern as they please will be pissed off!!!

Meanwhile, Spencer has been taken away (in retaliation), I have to face being falsely arrested and incarcerated every time that I walk into a courtroom (My next court date is 11/8/13 because the Judge keeps issuing a continuances (instead of a dismissal) on a fraudulent and made up Motion entitled “Motion to Address Child Support Arrears” (in an effort to somehow figure out how to falsely arrest and incarcerate me again in order to silence me).

I mean the bogus tactics… REALLY??? 

At some point it should dawn on you… the many – numerous – collective – We the People YOU that NO citizen of the United States of America should ever again have to endure what Spencer, my family and I have endured over the last five years!!!  EVER!!!

Bottom line is that Attorney General Eric Holder and Attorney / President Obama have the CONSTITUTIONAL duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America but they are not going to do so unless We the People DEMAND that they do.  

Moral obligation aside, it costs money to continue the pattern of blatant disregard for the Constitution.... Seriously!!! 

You can thank each of your Elected Officials for wasting more of your Taxpayer/ Citizens without Rights-Funded money by continuing States Rights to Govern as it Pleases because cases like mine and millions of others (with unintentional AND INTENTIONAL Frivolous Errors) cost tax payers billions of dollars each year (nationwide) in  settlement agreements to citizens who were falsely arrested and/ or falsely incarcerated... AND that's only if the falsely arrested and accused can prove that their rights have been violated and only if elected officials Like President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder choose to "enforce" the Constitution.  In this instance, the prospect of justice is like seeing a shooting star.

However, an alternative to this madness was in fact proposed to ALL 5,000 + "Insider" and that is enact a Frivolous Error Fee to detour elected officials, State employees, etc. from participating in violating individuals Constitutional Rights through States Rights to Govern as it Pleases.

A Frivolous Error Fee would deduct Frivolous Errors from individual participants personal Taxpayer/ Citizens without Rights-Funded paychecks… instead of having taxpayers fund preventable Errors that result in lawsuits against the State and Federal Government or at worse allowing individuals whose rights have been violated to never-ever receive justice in their case(s).

Keep in mind that its in our (We the People's) best interest to enact a Frivolous Error Fee because false institutionalization's, false incarcerations, intentionally and fraudulently lengthy Trial procedures that promote job, benefit and perk security for Justices, Judges, Attorney’s, Court Reporters, Police Officers, Jail and Prison Guards, etc. as well as FREE Modern Day Slave LABOR for Corporations, drain our already frail economy.


Question #11 - What in the world is their reasoning for saying you can't see, keep, visit Spencer? I don't understand why someone is trying to keep him from you.

The short story is that I cannot see Spencer because I exercised my Constitutional Right to refuse to be psychologically evaluated by their designated psychologist who also happens to be their Attorney Colleague. I chose to refuse because they choose to operate under States’ Rights to Govern not only as it Pleases but as they Please.  If they can direct the Social Services Coordinator to leave out relevant trial information; direct the Court Reporter to change the Trial transcript; direct Spencer’s Attorney /Guardian Ad Litem to “FORGET” relevant trial information; direct the Clerk of the Court to refuse to file and date stamp petitions, motions, witness subpoena, etc; direct the Sheriff’s to falsely arrest and incarcerate me for TEN (10) DAYS for requested my right to visit Spencer as ORDERED by the same judge that turned around and arrested me for asking… THEN why on God’s green earth would I CHOSE to be psychologically evaluated by not just the Attorney / Psychologist that they have selected and designated… BUT ANYONE licensed in ANY State that has the right to Govern as it Pleases!!!  Meanwhile I have not been allowed to see Spencer in three years, have not been allowed to speak with in in over a year and the legal document that says I STILL legally have Joint Custody means absolutely nothing.  Nine separate cases have been filled in two different States, two different U.S. District Courts and two totally separate U.S. Court of Appeals.  Finally, this is the second time that the cases have made it to the U.S. Supreme Court.  The first set of three cases were filed in 2012.

Question #12 - How about Supervised Visitation… Judge John Goger granted Supervised visitation, why not exercise Supervised visitation?  For the same reasons listed in Question 5.  

Additionally, from a financial standpoint, why would I pay approximately $65.00 per hour (the average fee for Supervised Visitation) for their designated Attorney / Psychologist to supervise me while visiting with Spencer?  As mentioned, I had to pay for Court Reporter Nanette Hull's Trial Take Down fees and falsified Trial and Deposition Transcripts fees during my first Trial and had to pay for Guardian Ad Litem / Attorney Karlise Griers legal fees and she “forget” to bring the evidence that she compiled for over a year and a half to testify with during the second Trail… so again, why would I pay for yet another opportunity for Judge John Goger (or any other Judge) to manipulate the evidence in their favor? Such a choice would only serve to provide immunity from Federal prosecution for the individuals who participated in the Errors (or Crimes) through additional cover-ups.

Question #13 - Are there any Georgia Legal grounds to establish Supervised Visitation and if so, are there any legal grounds to establish Un-Supervised visitation?

From a legal standpoint, the Georgia Supreme Court established a clear legal precedence for Un-Supervised Visitation in 289 Ga. 814 S11F0835 SIGAL v. SIGAL, which specifies the warranted legal reasoning for Supervised visitation, which is a history of drug use.  My ex-husband and not I have a history of drug use (although my ex-husband has NEVER been Ordered or required to submit to Supervised visitation). Chief Judge Cynthia Wright acknowledged my ex-husbands history of drug use in our Final Decree of Divorce and Ordered that my ex-husband submit to drug testing but never Ordered Supervised visitation. It should also be noted that ALL of the Judges(including the Presiding Judges) refused to require Drug Testing from my ex-husband although they received the request via a filed and date stamped Motion and the requirement that my ex-husband submit to drug testing was upheld by the Georgia Supreme Court in Case Nos S10F1357, S10F1358 Willis v. Willis. Finally, the warranted legal timeframe for a parent to regain Un-Supervised visitation... as fraudulently Ordered (by Judge John Goger) for me and not my ex-husband as outlined in 289 Ga. 814 S11F0835 SIGAL v. SIGAL.  Finally, it should be noted that my ex-husband is now a children's Soccer Coach with another former Attorney and Fraternity Brother Soccer Coach  who was Disbarred... and not sentenced to Prison or not even Jail for 10 days for the Felony Crime of Trafficking Cocaine.  The Tiger Soccer Club was founded  and currently being managed by Attorneys who I believe also happen to be members of the same Fraternity. 

Again, as it pertains to my case, there are no proven legal grounds to require Supervised visitation from me.  However, that didn’t stop Judge John Goger from using is “Discernment” to determine that it was in Spencer’s “Best Interest to completely ignore the Georgia Supreme Court legal precedence.  

In my case, a case where Judge John Goger fraudulently issued an Order to require Supervised visitation, you have to look to Georgia Supreme Court case 289 Ga. 814 S11F0835 SIGAL v. SIGAL as a means to re-establish Un-Supervised visitation because the court clearly established the timeframe for Supervised visitation of a parent AND I have already exceeded the required legal timeframe for Supervised visitation.  Therefore legally, I should be granted my legal right to Un-Supervised visitation.  However, ALL of the Judges (including the Presiding Judges who have been presented this case law in the form of a filed and date stamped Motion) have developed amnesia when it comes to ruling (minimally) based on Georgia Law… and of course they don’t believe in actually granting my right (or any other citizens right) to have access to the Constitutional Rights afforded them as citizens of the United States of America over their States’ Rights to Govern as they Please.  Hence the need for President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to file my four (4) States Rights to Govern as it Pleases cases with the U.S. Supreme Court.

Question #14 - How is Spencer?

He is sick often because my ex-husband still does not know how to properly care for him, his voice is sunken/ sad and he misses me dearly. Not well.



Question #15 - What's the difference between a Pinhead, a Patriot and a Crook?


Over the years, I have posed the question… What’s the difference between a Pinhead, a Patriot and a Crook? Year after year, I’ve found that the message is still quite relevant. Here is a repost of my message to “Insiders”….


Bill O'Reilly (a self-described Independent) often uses his national - multifaceted media outlet to describe the difference between "Pinheads and Patriots" (http://www.billoreilly.com/pinheads-and-patriots ) and I thought it appropriate to expound on his definition of the two by asking...


What's the difference between a Pinhead, a Patriot and a Crook according to Kimberly's definition?


1.  Pinheads can knowingly or unknowingly make bad decisions for the country. Their bad choices for America (although sometimes egregious) are neither intentional nor malicious.


2.  Patriots are citizens who use their good character and unwavering values to operate from a place of integrity… which ultimately translates into good Policy for America.


3.  Crooks are "Pinheads" who intentionally and maliciously make egregious Policy decisions that are self-serving and ultimately bad for individuals, families, communities, professions, States and this Nation as a whole.


          

VIDEOS / CASE FILES

Historic Quotes

resources

​​Georgia Superior Court Cases                              North Carolina District Court
2009CV165814            2011CV205975                     14CVD00110                        
2010CV165814            2013CV231662

Georgia Appeals Court Case
A10D0402

Supreme Court of Georgia Cases                        Supreme Court of North Carolina
S10F1357                     S10C1648                             415A14 
S10F1358                     S15DO711     

​​

Federal Court Systems


United States District Court - GA                        United States District Court - NC
1-12-CV-1058-CAP      1-15-CV-0704-TWT               5-15:CV-57-BO                                                   1-12-CV-0573-CAP

      
United States Court of Appeals - GA                  United States Court of Appeals - NC
12-11607- C                 15-11930- F                          15-1242                                                              
12-11972- A

   

Supreme Court of the United States

15-6566 (representing the State of North Carolina)

15-6567 (representing the State of Georgia)

My Guiding Principles

state / federal case numbers

  • Lead with Good Character.
  • Lead with Un-Wavering Values.
  • Lead with High Integrity.
  • Lead by Example.

"Use your gifts, time, talents, skills, finances and resources... no matter your political affiliation, race, gender, religion, creed or sexual orientation to LEAD by Example and help form a more perfect union RIGHT NOW, for our children, for our Children's - Children and for the future of this nation."

- Kimberly T. Spence

Here are the States (including DC) with signatures represented on the Petition. 

Alabama                                Georgia                         Missouri                       Pennsylvania 

Arizona                                  Kentucky                       Nevada                         Tennessee 
   
California                               Louisiana                      New Jersey                   Texas    ​
   
Connecticut                          Maine                            New York                     Virginia
   
Delaware                               Montana                       North Carolina            Washington  
   
District of Columbia             Maryland                      Ohio                              Wisconsin      
   
Florida                                   Massachusetts             Oregon                                            
                                                 

Please email, share, post, like, text or tweet your friends and loved ones about the existing U.S. Supreme Court cases to help build our State Roll Call and ultimately help create the type awareness required for change via the 16 New U.S. Supreme Court Questions.